When to Use "Having Become" vs "Becoming" in English

Written by
Ernest Bio Bogore

Reviewed by
Ibrahim Litinine

Understanding the distinction between "having become" and "becoming" represents a critical juncture in mastering English grammar precision. This differentiation extends beyond mere academic exercise—it directly impacts how you communicate temporal relationships and express causality in professional and academic contexts.
The confusion surrounding these constructions stems from their shared root verb "become," yet they serve fundamentally different grammatical and semantic functions. While "becoming" operates as either a present participle or gerund, "having become" functions as a perfect participle, creating distinct temporal and logical relationships within sentence structures.
Understanding the Grammatical Foundation
The Perfect Participle Structure: "Having Become"
"Having become" represents a perfect participle construction that establishes a completed action occurring before another action or state. This construction signals temporal precedence and often implies causation or consequence.
The structure follows this pattern: "Having" + past participle ("become") creates a temporal anchor point that precedes the main clause action. This grammatical relationship proves essential for expressing complex temporal sequences and establishing clear cause-and-effect relationships.
Consider this professional context: "Having become the department head, Sarah implemented new efficiency protocols." The perfect participle "having become" establishes that Sarah's promotion occurred first, creating the foundation for her subsequent actions.
The Present Participle and Gerund: "Becoming"
"Becoming" functions in two primary capacities: as a present participle describing ongoing action or as a gerund functioning as a noun. This dual functionality creates versatility but demands contextual awareness for proper application.
As a present participle, "becoming" describes actions occurring simultaneously with the main verb or provides descriptive information about the subject. As a gerund, it transforms the verb into a noun phrase, allowing it to serve as subjects, objects, or complements.
The temporal relationship differs significantly from "having become." When using "becoming," you indicate ongoing process rather than completed precedent action.
Temporal Relationships and Sequence Logic
Perfect Participle Temporal Precedence
"Having become" establishes unambiguous temporal sequence. The action expressed in the perfect participle conclusively precedes the main clause action. This precedence often carries implications of causation or enabling conditions.
Professional writing frequently requires this temporal precision. "Having become proficient in data analysis, the team could tackle more complex projects" demonstrates how completed skill acquisition (having become proficient) enables subsequent capabilities (tackling complex projects).
The temporal gap between actions can vary significantly. "Having become" might reference actions completed moments before or years prior to the main clause action, depending on context and logical necessity.
Present Participle Simultaneity and Process
"Becoming" typically indicates simultaneity or ongoing process. The action occurs concurrently with or as part of the main clause action, creating different logical relationships than perfect participle constructions.
"Becoming increasingly confident, she began volunteering for challenging assignments" suggests that confidence building occurred simultaneously with increased volunteering, rather than as a completed prerequisite.
This simultaneity proves crucial for describing developmental processes, gradual changes, or ongoing transformations that coincide with other actions or states.
Practical Application Guidelines
Professional Communication Contexts
Business communication demands precise temporal relationships. "Having become" proves invaluable for describing qualifications, completed preparations, or established conditions that enable current capabilities or decisions.
"Having become ISO certified, the company expanded its international client base" clearly establishes certification as a completed prerequisite for expansion activities. This construction eliminates ambiguity about temporal sequence and causal relationships.
Conversely, "becoming" serves professional contexts requiring emphasis on ongoing development or concurrent processes. "The organization is becoming more efficient while maintaining quality standards" focuses on gradual, ongoing improvement rather than completed transformation.
Academic and Technical Writing Applications
Academic writing frequently requires complex temporal relationships and precise logical connections. "Having become" enables writers to establish foundational knowledge, completed research phases, or prerequisite conditions before discussing implications or subsequent developments.
"Having become familiar with quantum mechanics principles, researchers could explore advanced applications" establishes foundational knowledge as a completed precondition for advanced exploration. This construction proves essential for building logical arguments and establishing credibility.
Technical documentation benefits from "having become" when describing system states, completed configurations, or established conditions that enable subsequent operations or capabilities.
Common Usage Patterns and Contexts
Cause and Effect Relationships
"Having become" excels at expressing cause-and-effect relationships where the cause represents a completed state or condition. This construction implies that achieving the state described in the perfect participle created conditions enabling the main clause action.
"Having become financially stable, they purchased their first home" suggests that financial stability (completed condition) enabled home purchase (resulting action). The perfect participle construction emphasizes the causal relationship more strongly than alternative constructions.
Qualification and Enablement Scenarios
Professional and academic contexts frequently require expressing how completed qualifications or achievements enable subsequent actions or opportunities. "Having become" provides precise construction for these relationships.
"Having become board-certified, the physician could accept more complex cases" demonstrates how completed qualification (board certification) enables expanded professional capacity (accepting complex cases).
Developmental and Transformational Contexts
"Becoming" proves superior for describing ongoing development, gradual transformation, or processes in progress. This construction emphasizes the dynamic nature of change rather than completed states.
"The startup is becoming profitable through strategic partnerships" focuses on the ongoing process of achieving profitability rather than completed financial transformation.
Advanced Distinctions and Subtle Differences
Emphasis on Completion vs. Process
The choice between constructions significantly impacts reader perception of temporal relationships and completion status. "Having become" emphasizes completed transformation with subsequent implications, while "becoming" emphasizes ongoing process or simultaneous development.
This distinction proves crucial in professional contexts where stakeholders need clear understanding of current status versus ongoing developments. "Having completed the training program" versus "Completing the training program" creates different expectations about readiness and capability.
Formal vs. Informal Register Implications
"Having become" typically appears in formal, professional, or academic contexts where precise temporal relationships matter. The construction signals sophisticated grammar usage and attention to logical relationships.
"Becoming" demonstrates greater versatility across formal and informal contexts, making it accessible for various communication needs while maintaining grammatical correctness.
Logical Relationship Complexity
Complex professional and academic arguments often require multiple temporal relationships and causal connections. "Having become" enables writers to establish multiple prerequisite conditions before discussing implications or conclusions.
"Having become proficient in statistical analysis and having gained extensive field experience, the researcher could address complex methodological challenges" demonstrates how multiple completed conditions enable sophisticated capabilities.
Regional and Style Variations
British vs. American Usage Patterns
Both constructions appear consistently across English variants, though emphasis and frequency may vary slightly. British academic writing may show slight preference for perfect participle constructions in formal contexts, while American usage demonstrates equal comfort with both forms.
Professional communication standards remain consistent across regions, with temporal precision valued equally in international business contexts.
Industry-Specific Preferences
Technical industries often favor "having become" for describing system states, completed configurations, or established conditions that enable operations. The construction provides precision required for technical documentation and procedural writing.
Creative industries may demonstrate greater flexibility, using "becoming" to emphasize ongoing development and dynamic processes that characterize creative work environments.
Practical Exercises and Application
Sentence Construction Strategies
Effective application requires understanding the logical relationship you intend to express. Before choosing between constructions, identify whether you're describing:
- Completed conditions enabling subsequent actions (use "having become")
- Ongoing processes or simultaneous developments (use "becoming")
- Causal relationships with clear temporal precedence (use "having become")
- Dynamic transformations in progress (use "becoming")
Context Analysis Framework
Professional writing benefits from systematic analysis of temporal relationships and logical connections. Consider the intended emphasis: completed enablement versus ongoing development, precedent conditions versus simultaneous processes, established qualifications versus developing capabilities.
This analytical approach ensures appropriate construction choice while maintaining clarity and precision in complex professional communication contexts.
Learn Any Language with Kylian AI
Private language lessons are expensive. Paying between 15 and 50 euros per lesson isn’t realistic for most people—especially when dozens of sessions are needed to see real progress.

Many learners give up on language learning due to these high costs, missing out on valuable professional and personal opportunities.
That’s why we created Kylian: to make language learning accessible to everyone and help people master a foreign language without breaking the bank.
To get started, just tell Kylian which language you want to learn and what your native language is
Tired of teachers who don’t understand your specific struggles as a French speaker? Kylian’s advantage lies in its ability to teach any language using your native tongue as the foundation.
Unlike generic apps that offer the same content to everyone, Kylian explains concepts in your native language (French) and switches to the target language when necessary—perfectly adapting to your level and needs.

This personalization removes the frustration and confusion that are so common in traditional language learning.
Choose a specific topic you want to learn
Frustrated by language lessons that never cover exactly what you need? Kylian can teach you any aspect of a language—from pronunciation to advanced grammar—by focusing on your specific goals.
Avoid vague requests like “How can I improve my accent?” and be precise: “How do I pronounce the R like a native English speaker?” or “How do I conjugate the verb ‘to be’ in the present tense?”

With Kylian, you’ll never again pay for irrelevant content or feel embarrassed asking “too basic” questions to a teacher. Your learning plan is entirely personalized.
Once you’ve chosen your topic, just hit the “Generate a Lesson” button, and within seconds, you’ll get a lesson designed exclusively for you.
Join the room to begin your lesson
The session feels like a one-on-one language class with a human tutor—but without the high price or time constraints.

In a 25-minute lesson, Kylian teaches exactly what you need to know about your chosen topic: the nuances that textbooks never explain, key cultural differences between French and your target language, grammar rules, and much more.

Ever felt frustrated trying to keep up with a native-speaking teacher, or embarrassed to ask for something to be repeated? With Kylian, that problem disappears. It switches intelligently between French and the target language depending on your level, helping you understand every concept at your own pace.

During the lesson, Kylian uses role-plays, real-life examples, and adapts to your learning style. Didn’t understand something? No problem—you can pause Kylian anytime to ask for clarification, without fear of being judged.

Ask all the questions you want, repeat sections if needed, and customize your learning experience in ways traditional teachers and generic apps simply can’t match.

With 24/7 access at a fraction of the cost of private lessons, Kylian removes all the barriers that have kept you from mastering the language you’ve always wanted to learn.

Similar Content You Might Want To Read

Proficient At, With, or In? Learn Preposition Use in English
Language precision matters. The subtle difference between saying "proficient at coding," "proficient in coding," or "proficient with coding" might seem inconsequential to many English learners, but these preposition choices reveal deeper linguistic patterns that impact communication clarity. The challenge of selecting the right preposition after "proficient" represents a common stumbling block even for advanced English speakers. Why does this distinction matter? Because precision in language signals competence. When professionals describe their skills on resumes, during interviews, or in workplace communications, the preposition they pair with "proficient" subtly shapes how others perceive their expertise. These small linguistic choices build credibility—or undermine it. This guide examines the nuanced differences between "proficient at," "proficient with," and "proficient in," providing clear guidance on when to use each construction. By understanding these distinctions, you'll communicate more precisely and project greater language mastery.

The Plural of Forum in English: Forms vs Forums
Communication platforms have evolved dramatically throughout history, from ancient Roman public squares to today's digital discussion boards. At the core of these spaces lies the concept of a "forum" – a gathering place for exchange of ideas. But when referring to multiple such platforms, should we say "forums" or "fora"? This question leads us into the fascinating realm of English pluralization rules and their classical language exceptions.

What Is the Past Tense of Catch in English?
The verb "catch" represents one of those fundamental English verbs that appears deceptively simple yet contains nuanced usage patterns that create challenges for language learners. Understanding its past tense forms requires examining both regular patterns in English verb conjugation and the irregular patterns that make "catch" particularly interesting. When we analyze "catch" in its various temporal contexts, we find that its past tense is "caught" - an irregular form that doesn't follow the standard "-ed" pattern of regular verbs. This irregularity creates one of those critical learning moments for English language students where memorization becomes as important as pattern recognition. The question "what is the past tense of catch?" appears straightforward but opens a window into the complexity of English verb tenses and their historical development. Let's dissect this verb systematically to understand not just what forms to use, but why and when to use them.

English Diphthongs: Examples and Pronunciation Guide
Are you finding English pronunciation challenging because of those blended vowel sounds? Many language learners struggle with diphthongs—these complex vowel combinations that native speakers articulate effortlessly. Mastering these sounds is crucial for achieving fluency and natural-sounding speech in English. In this comprehensive guide, we'll explore what diphthongs are, analyze all eight diphthong sounds in English with practical examples, and provide evidence-based strategies to help you pronounce them correctly. By the end, you'll have the knowledge and tools to approach these challenging sounds with confidence.

Spanish vs Italian: Decisive Guide for Language Enthusiasts
Choosing your next language learning journey requires careful consideration. When contemplating Romance languages, Spanish and Italian often emerge as top contenders. Both offer rich cultural heritage, practical applications, and accessible learning curves for English speakers. This guide dissects the critical differences and similarities to help you make an informed decision aligned with your personal goals.

Why Is 'Told' the Past Tense of 'Tell'? Complete Explanation
The English language presents a fascinating tapestry of patterns and exceptions that reflect its complex historical evolution. One particular area that often challenges both native speakers and language learners is verb conjugation, especially when dealing with irregular verbs. Among these, the verb "tell" stands as a compelling case study—transforming into "told" in the past tense rather than following the regular pattern of adding "-ed." This irregularity isn't random but represents a linguistic window into the deeper historical processes that have shaped Modern English. Understanding why "tell" becomes "told" requires us to examine the historical development of English, the linguistic mechanisms of sound change, and the classification systems that help us make sense of irregular verb patterns. By exploring these elements, we gain not only practical knowledge of English grammar but also insight into how languages evolve and maintain vestiges of their historical development even as they change.