The Plural of Forum in English: Forms vs Forums

Communication platforms have evolved dramatically throughout history, from ancient Roman public squares to today's digital discussion boards. At the core of these spaces lies the concept of a "forum" – a gathering place for exchange of ideas. But when referring to multiple such platforms, should we say "forums" or "fora"? This question leads us into the fascinating realm of English pluralization rules and their classical language exceptions.

What is a Forum?

The term "forum" originates from Ancient Rome, where it described an open public square used for judicial proceedings, markets, and public discourse. The most famous example, the Roman Forum (Forum Romanum), served as the heart of social and political life in ancient Rome.

In contemporary usage, "forum" has expanded to encompass:

Online discussion boards where users exchange ideas, ask questions, and share information

Physical venues for public discussion and debate

Formal gatherings where experts discuss specialized topics

Legal jurisdictions where cases are heard and resolved

When referring to multiple instances of these platforms, English speakers face a choice between the standard English plural "forums" and the Latin-derived "fora."

What is the Plural of Forum?

The plural of forum can be either "forums" or "fora," with "forums" being the more commonly used form in modern English. This dual possibility stems from the word's Latin origin and exemplifies how English incorporates and adapts foreign loanwords.

Forums: The Anglicized Plural

"Forums" follows the standard English pluralization pattern of adding "-s" to nouns ending in consonants. This form has become predominant in everyday usage, business communications, and even academic writing.

Usage examples:

"The company hosts several online forums for customer support."

"Social media forums have transformed how we discuss political issues."

"Different forums exist for various programming languages and frameworks."

Fora: The Classical Plural

"Fora" represents the traditional Latin plural form. In Latin, many masculine nouns ending in "-us" form their plurals by changing to "-a" (e.g., curriculum/curricula, datum/data). While less common in casual conversation, "fora" still appears in academic, legal, and formal contexts.

Usage examples:

"Academic fora provide spaces for scholarly debate and discourse."

"The university hosts various fora on ethical issues in technology."

"International fora have addressed the climate change crisis for decades."

Which is More Common: Forums or Fora?

Linguistic data overwhelmingly indicates that "forums" has become the standard plural form in contemporary English usage. Google Ngram Viewer, which analyzes word frequency in published books, shows "forums" appearing approximately 10 times more frequently than "fora" in modern English writing.

This trend reflects a broader pattern in English language evolution: the naturalization of foreign loanwords to follow standard English grammatical patterns. While "fora" maintains a presence in specialized contexts, "forums" dominates in everyday communication, journalistic writing, and increasingly in formal settings as well.

When to Use "Forums" vs. "Fora"

The choice between these plural forms often depends on context, audience, and the level of formality required.

When to Use "Forums"

"Forums" is appropriate in most contexts, especially:

Everyday conversation and informal writing

Business and professional communications

Technology discussions (particularly about online discussion platforms)

Journalistic writing

Most contemporary academic publications

When to Use "Fora"

"Fora" might be preferred in:

Highly formal or traditional academic writing, particularly in classics, law, or linguistics

Legal documents and scholarly publications

Contexts where precision regarding classical terminology is valued

Writing for audiences who appreciate traditional Latin forms

Other Words with Latin Origin That Have Two Plural Forms

"Forum" is not alone in having both an Anglicized and a classical plural form. Many Latin-derived words in English exhibit this duality:

Stadium: stadiums/stadia

Curriculum: curriculums/curricula

Memorandum: memorandums/memoranda

Referendum: referendums/referenda

Medium: mediums/media

Aquarium: aquariums/aquaria

Symposium: symposiums/symposia

These pairs illustrate English's flexible approach to incorporating foreign words. The trend generally moves toward the Anglicized forms (-s, -es) becoming dominant over time, though classical plurals often remain in specialized or formal contexts.

The Evolution of Latin Plurals in English

The dual pluralization of words like "forum" reflects the broader historical journey of the English language. English has continuously absorbed vocabulary from other languages, particularly Latin and Greek, due to historical factors including:

The Roman occupation of Britain (43-410 CE)

The influence of the Catholic Church throughout medieval Europe

The Renaissance revival of classical learning

The adoption of Latin as the language of science and academia well into the 19th century

Initially, educated English speakers maintained classical pluralization patterns as a marker of erudition and proper usage. However, as these words became more integrated into everyday speech, the natural tendency toward regularization pushed many toward standard English plural forms.

This process continues today, with words at different stages of naturalization. While "data" (originally the plural of "datum") has largely become treated as a singular mass noun in common usage, other Latin plurals like "criteria" still maintain their distinct status as plurals of "criterion."

The Linguistic Debate: Prescriptivism vs. Descriptivism

The question of whether to use "forums" or "fora" touches on a fundamental linguistic debate between two approaches to language:

Prescriptivism

The prescriptivist view holds that language should follow established rules and traditions. From this perspective, maintaining classical plurals like "fora" preserves linguistic precision and historical connections. Prescriptivists might argue that "fora" is the "correct" plural because it honors the word's Latin origins.

Descriptivism

The descriptivist approach observes how language is actually used rather than dictating how it should be used. Descriptivists note that "forums" has become the predominant form through natural language evolution. From this viewpoint, the widespread adoption of "forums" makes it equally valid as "fora."

Most modern linguists lean toward descriptivism, recognizing that languages naturally evolve through usage. The shift from "fora" to "forums" represents not a degradation but a normal adaptation process that has characterized English throughout its history.

How Online Communication Has Influenced Usage

The digital revolution has significantly impacted the usage frequency of "forums" versus "fora." As online discussion platforms proliferated in the 1990s and 2000s, they were almost universally labeled as "forums" or "message boards." This technological application reinforced the Anglicized plural in everyday language.

The term "internet forums" has become standardized to the point where using "internet fora" might seem affected or unnecessarily formal to many readers. This demonstrates how new applications of a word can solidify particular grammatical forms.

Usage in Different English Variants

While "forums" dominates globally, subtle differences exist in how various English-speaking regions approach classical plurals:

British English has historically been somewhat more conservative in maintaining classical forms compared to American English

Academic publications in Commonwealth countries might use "fora" slightly more frequently

American English shows a stronger tendency toward regularized plurals like "forums"

Legal English, regardless of region, tends to preserve classical forms longer than general usage

Despite these nuances, the overall trend in all major English variants moves toward the regularized "forums," with "fora" increasingly restricted to specialized or deliberately formal contexts.

Guidelines for Writers and Editors

For those crafting content involving the plural of "forum," consider these practical guidelines:

For general audiences, "forums" is the clear choice for clarity and natural communication

In academic or specialized writing, consider your field's conventions and audience expectations

Maintain consistency within a document—don't alternate between "forums" and "fora"

When writing about online discussion platforms specifically, "forums" is the established term

For formal documents with international or traditional academic audiences, "fora" may still be appropriate

The Psychological Impact of Language Choices

Our choice between "forums" and "fora" can subtly influence how messages are received. Using "fora" may project erudition and formality but risks appearing pretentious to some audiences. Conversely, "forums" signals accessibility and contemporary relevance but might seem less precise in highly formal contexts.

These perceptions reflect how language choices function as social markers, indicating educational background, attention to tradition, and communication priorities. Neither choice is inherently superior, but each carries implicit social signaling worth considering for effective communication.

Digital Communication and Language Simplification

The digital age has accelerated many language trends, including the simplification of complex grammatical forms. As communication becomes increasingly rapid and global, accessible forms like "forums" gain advantage over specialized forms like "fora" that require specific educational background to recognize and use correctly.

This pattern extends beyond plural forms to many aspects of language, reflecting how digital communication prioritizes clarity, accessibility, and efficiency. The dominance of "forums" in online contexts exemplifies this broader linguistic shift toward forms that facilitate immediate comprehension across diverse audiences.

Educational Implications

The "forums" versus "fora" question presents valuable teaching opportunities about language evolution, the influence of classical languages on English, and sociolinguistic variation. Rather than prescribing one form as correct, educators can use such examples to illustrate how language continuously adapts to serve communication needs.

This approach helps students develop nuanced understanding of language as a living system rather than a fixed set of rules. Recognizing both "forums" and "fora" as valid within different contexts encourages linguistic flexibility and audience awareness—crucial skills in effective communication.

Learn Any Language with Kylian AI

Private language lessons are expensive. Paying between 15 and 50 euros per lesson isn’t realistic for most people—especially when dozens of sessions are needed to see real progress.

Many learners give up on language learning due to these high costs, missing out on valuable professional and personal opportunities.

That’s why we created Kylian: to make language learning accessible to everyone and help people master a foreign language without breaking the bank.

To get started, just tell Kylian which language you want to learn and what your native language is

Tired of teachers who don’t understand your specific struggles as a French speaker? Kylian’s advantage lies in its ability to teach any language using your native tongue as the foundation.

Unlike generic apps that offer the same content to everyone, Kylian explains concepts in your native language (French) and switches to the target language when necessary—perfectly adapting to your level and needs.

This personalization removes the frustration and confusion that are so common in traditional language learning.

Choose a specific topic you want to learn

Frustrated by language lessons that never cover exactly what you need? Kylian can teach you any aspect of a language—from pronunciation to advanced grammar—by focusing on your specific goals.

Avoid vague requests like “How can I improve my accent?” and be precise: “How do I pronounce the R like a native English speaker?” or “How do I conjugate the verb ‘to be’ in the present tense?”

With Kylian, you’ll never again pay for irrelevant content or feel embarrassed asking “too basic” questions to a teacher. Your learning plan is entirely personalized.

Once you’ve chosen your topic, just hit the “Generate a Lesson” button, and within seconds, you’ll get a lesson designed exclusively for you.

Join the room to begin your lesson

The session feels like a one-on-one language class with a human tutor—but without the high price or time constraints.

In a 25-minute lesson, Kylian teaches exactly what you need to know about your chosen topic: the nuances that textbooks never explain, key cultural differences between French and your target language, grammar rules, and much more.

Ever felt frustrated trying to keep up with a native-speaking teacher, or embarrassed to ask for something to be repeated? With Kylian, that problem disappears. It switches intelligently between French and the target language depending on your level, helping you understand every concept at your own pace.

During the lesson, Kylian uses role-plays, real-life examples, and adapts to your learning style. Didn’t understand something? No problem—you can pause Kylian anytime to ask for clarification, without fear of being judged.

Ask all the questions you want, repeat sections if needed, and customize your learning experience in ways traditional teachers and generic apps simply can’t match.

With 24/7 access at a fraction of the cost of private lessons, Kylian removes all the barriers that have kept you from mastering the language you’ve always wanted to learn.