When to Use Which or That: Complete Grammar Guide

Grammar precision matters. Every word choice carries weight, and nowhere is this more evident than in the distinction between "which" and "that." These two relative pronouns appear in countless sentences daily, yet their misuse remains one of the most persistent issues in professional writing.

The confusion stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of clause types and their functions. Most writers operate on instinct alone, leading to inconsistent usage that undermines clarity and professionalism. This guide dissects the mechanics behind proper "which" and "that" usage, providing concrete rules that eliminate guesswork.

The Foundation: Understanding Relative Clauses

Before examining when to use which or that, we must establish the grammatical framework that governs their usage. Relative clauses serve as modifiers, providing additional information about nouns. However, not all relative clauses function identically—their purpose determines which relative pronoun fits.

The distinction centers on whether the clause restricts or merely describes. This difference isn't semantic preference; it's structural necessity that affects meaning, punctuation, and reader comprehension. Writers who grasp this fundamental concept can navigate "which" versus "that" decisions with confidence.

Consider the logical flow: if a clause fundamentally changes what we're discussing, it requires different treatment than a clause that simply adds extra detail. This principle underlies every "which" or "that" decision, making it the cornerstone of proper usage.

Restrictive Clauses: The Domain of "That"

Restrictive clauses, also termed defining or essential clauses, narrow down the noun they modify. These clauses don't merely add information—they specify exactly which item or concept the sentence addresses. Remove a restrictive clause, and the sentence's meaning shifts dramatically or becomes unclear.

The word "that" introduces restrictive clauses because it signals essential information. This usage reflects the word's inherent limiting function—"that" points to specific items among a larger group. The connection isn't arbitrary; it stems from the word's demonstrative nature.

Restrictive clauses require no comma separation because they integrate directly into the sentence's core meaning. The lack of commas signals to readers that this information is non-negotiable for understanding the sentence's intent.

Practical Applications of Restrictive Clauses

Consider this sentence: "The laptop that crashed yesterday needs immediate repair." Here, "that crashed yesterday" restricts which laptop requires attention. Without this clause, we'd have "The laptop needs immediate repair"—a statement that could apply to any laptop in the vicinity.

The restrictive nature becomes clearer when multiple options exist. "Students that submit assignments late will receive grade penalties" specifically addresses late-submitting students, not all students. The clause creates a meaningful distinction within the student population.

Business communications particularly benefit from restrictive clause precision. "The contract that expires next month requires renewal" targets a specific contract among potentially many. This specificity prevents confusion and ensures clear action items.

Recognition Strategies for Restrictive Usage

Writers can identify restrictive clauses through elimination testing. Remove the clause and assess whether the sentence's meaning remains intact. If removal creates ambiguity or changes the intended message, the clause is restrictive and demands "that."

Another indicator involves the availability of alternatives. When multiple options exist for the noun being modified, and the clause helps identify which specific option applies, restrictive usage is appropriate. The clause serves as a filter, narrowing possibilities to the relevant subset.

The presence of articles also provides clues. Definite articles ("the") often precede nouns that will be restricted by "that" clauses, while indefinite articles ("a," "an") may suggest broader, less specific references that could accommodate "which."

Nonrestrictive Clauses: The Territory of "Which"

Nonrestrictive clauses, alternatively called non-defining or nonessential clauses, provide supplementary information without altering the sentence's fundamental meaning. These clauses enhance understanding but remain removable without affecting core comprehension.

The word "which" introduces nonrestrictive clauses because it signals additional rather than essential information. Unlike "that," which narrows focus, "which" expands description without changing the subject's identity. This functional difference drives the grammatical distinction.

Comma placement becomes crucial with nonrestrictive clauses. Commas set off these clauses because they represent parenthetical information—helpful but not integral to the sentence's primary message. The punctuation signals optional rather than mandatory content.

Strategic Implementation of Nonrestrictive Clauses

Examine this example: "My car, which I bought last year, runs efficiently." The clause "which I bought last year" adds context about the car's acquisition but doesn't identify which car among multiple options. The speaker has one car, and the clause provides background information.

Professional writing benefits from strategic nonrestrictive clause usage. "Our quarterly report, which includes detailed analytics, will be distributed tomorrow" adds relevant detail without creating confusion about which report. The clause enriches understanding while maintaining clarity about the subject.

Academic writing frequently employs nonrestrictive clauses to provide scholarly context. "Darwin's theory, which revolutionized biological science, continues influencing research today" offers historical perspective without restricting which theory receives discussion.

Mastering Nonrestrictive Recognition

The removability test proves particularly effective for nonrestrictive clauses. If clause removal leaves the sentence's meaning unchanged, nonrestrictive usage applies. The remaining sentence should feel complete and unambiguous.

Consider the uniqueness of the noun being modified. Proper nouns, unique objects, or previously established subjects often take nonrestrictive clauses because no ambiguity exists about their identity. The clause decorates rather than defines.

Comma intuition can guide decision-making. If natural speech patterns suggest pauses before and after the clause, nonrestrictive usage likely applies. These pauses correspond to the comma placement that sets off nonrestrictive information.

Comparative Analysis: Same Sentence, Different Meanings

The choice between "which" and "that" can fundamentally alter sentence meaning. This power demonstrates why proper usage matters beyond mere grammatical correctness—it affects communication accuracy and reader interpretation.

Consider these contrasting examples:

"The smartphone that supports 5G connectivity costs more" suggests multiple smartphones, with the 5G-supporting one commanding higher prices. The restrictive clause identifies which specific smartphone carries the premium cost.

"The smartphone, which supports 5G connectivity, costs more" implies a single smartphone under discussion, with 5G support mentioned as additional information. The nonrestrictive clause provides context without creating distinctions among multiple devices.

This difference affects business communications significantly. "Employees that work remotely must submit weekly reports" creates a policy specifically for remote workers. "Employees, who work remotely, must submit weekly reports" suggests all employees work remotely and must submit reports.

Legal and Technical Implications

Contract language demonstrates the critical nature of proper "which" and "that" usage. "Equipment that requires calibration must be serviced monthly" creates specific obligations for certain equipment. "Equipment, which requires calibration, must be serviced monthly" suggests all equipment requires both calibration and monthly service.

Technical documentation relies heavily on precise clause distinctions. "Software that contains security vulnerabilities needs immediate updates" targets specific software requiring attention. "Software, which contains security vulnerabilities, needs immediate updates" implies all software contains vulnerabilities.

Academic writing demands similar precision. "Studies that include diverse populations show better generalizability" makes claims about specific research types. "Studies, which include diverse populations, show better generalizability" suggests all studies include diverse populations.

Regional Variations and Style Preferences

British English traditionally allows more flexibility in restrictive clause usage, permitting "which" in contexts where American English mandates "that." However, this flexibility can create confusion and inconsistency, particularly in international communications.

American English maintains stricter distinctions, reserving "which" exclusively for nonrestrictive clauses. This approach provides clearer guidelines and reduces ambiguity, making it preferable for professional and academic writing regardless of audience location.

Style guides generally recommend American conventions for international publications. The Associated Press Stylebook, Chicago Manual of Style, and MLA Handbook all advocate for distinct "which" and "that" usage patterns that align with American preferences.

Professional Writing Standards

Corporate communications benefit from consistent "which" and "that" usage. Style guides help organizations maintain uniformity across documents, reducing reader confusion and projecting professionalism. Training programs often address these distinctions as part of business writing curriculum.

Publishing standards increasingly favor American conventions due to global audience considerations. International readers encounter American English frequently, making these conventions more universally recognizable and accepted.

Legal documents particularly require precise "which" and "that" usage due to the interpretive consequences of ambiguous language. Courts have ruled on contract disputes arising from unclear relative clause usage, emphasizing the practical importance of proper grammar.

Advanced Applications and Edge Cases

Certain sentence structures create complexity in "which" versus "that" decisions. Sentences with multiple clauses, compound subjects, or nested relative constructions require careful analysis to maintain clarity and correctness.

Nested relative clauses demand particular attention to avoid confusion. "The project that includes features which enhance user experience will launch first" combines restrictive and nonrestrictive elements appropriately. The "that" clause restricts which project launches first, while the "which" clause adds information about the features.

Compound sentences with multiple relative clauses need consistent application of restrictions. "The software that streamlines workflow and the hardware that supports it both require updates" maintains parallel structure with appropriate "that" usage throughout.

Complex Sentence Navigation

Professional writers encounter sentences where clause relationships aren't immediately clear. In such cases, parsing the sentence into component parts helps identify each clause's function and select appropriate relative pronouns.

Consider this complex example: "The research methodology that we developed, which incorporates machine learning algorithms, produces more accurate results than traditional approaches." The "that" clause restricts which methodology produced superior results, while the "which" clause adds technical details about the methodology's characteristics.

Technical writing often presents similar challenges where precision matters enormously. "The protocol that ensures data security, which we implemented last quarter, has reduced breach incidents by 40%" demonstrates proper usage in complex professional contexts.

Common Errors and Correction Strategies

Misplaced commas represent the most frequent error in "which" and "that" usage. Writers often punctuate based on speech patterns rather than grammatical rules, leading to comma splices or missing comma separation in nonrestrictive clauses.

Overcorrection creates another common problem. Writers who learn about "which" and "that" distinctions sometimes apply rules rigidly without considering context or meaning. This approach can create awkward constructions that prioritize technical correctness over natural expression.

Inconsistency within documents undermines professionalism and clarity. Writers may correctly use "which" and "that" individually but fail to maintain consistent patterns throughout longer pieces, creating confusion for readers who notice the variations.

Systematic Correction Approaches

Developing personal editing checklists helps writers catch "which" and "that" errors during revision. These checklists should include steps for identifying clause types, checking comma placement, and verifying meaning consistency.

Reading sentences aloud reveals many "which" and "that" problems. Natural speech patterns often align with proper punctuation, making audio review an effective editing technique. Pauses in speech typically correspond to comma placement in nonrestrictive clauses.

Peer review provides external perspective on clause clarity. Other readers can identify ambiguous constructions or inconsistent usage that writers miss during self-editing. This collaborative approach improves overall writing quality.

Digital Age Considerations

Automated grammar checkers provide mixed results for "which" and "that" usage. While these tools catch obvious errors, they often miss subtle meaning distinctions that affect sentence interpretation. Writers should use these tools as supplements rather than replacements for grammatical understanding.

Content management systems and collaborative writing platforms require consistent "which" and "that" usage across multiple contributors. Style guides become particularly important in these environments to maintain document coherence and professionalism.

Search engine optimization considerations don't typically affect "which" and "that" choices directly, but clear, grammatically correct writing improves user experience and content credibility. Proper relative pronoun usage contributes to overall content quality metrics.

Technology-Assisted Writing

Modern writing tools increasingly incorporate advanced grammar checking that addresses "which" and "that" distinctions. However, these tools require human judgment to evaluate context and meaning. Writers must understand the underlying principles to use technology effectively.

Voice recognition software presents unique challenges for "which" and "that" usage because these words sound similar in casual speech. Writers using dictation tools must pay particular attention to reviewing and correcting relative pronoun choices during editing.

Collaborative editing platforms benefit from clear commenting systems that explain "which" and "that" corrections. These explanations help team members understand the reasoning behind changes and improve their own usage patterns over time.

Learn Any Language with Kylian AI

Private language lessons are expensive. Paying between 15 and 50 euros per lesson isn’t realistic for most people—especially when dozens of sessions are needed to see real progress.

Many learners give up on language learning due to these high costs, missing out on valuable professional and personal opportunities.

That’s why we created Kylian: to make language learning accessible to everyone and help people master a foreign language without breaking the bank.

To get started, just tell Kylian which language you want to learn and what your native language is

Tired of teachers who don’t understand your specific struggles as a French speaker? Kylian’s advantage lies in its ability to teach any language using your native tongue as the foundation.

Unlike generic apps that offer the same content to everyone, Kylian explains concepts in your native language (French) and switches to the target language when necessary—perfectly adapting to your level and needs.

This personalization removes the frustration and confusion that are so common in traditional language learning.

Choose a specific topic you want to learn

Frustrated by language lessons that never cover exactly what you need? Kylian can teach you any aspect of a language—from pronunciation to advanced grammar—by focusing on your specific goals.

Avoid vague requests like “How can I improve my accent?” and be precise: “How do I pronounce the R like a native English speaker?” or “How do I conjugate the verb ‘to be’ in the present tense?”

With Kylian, you’ll never again pay for irrelevant content or feel embarrassed asking “too basic” questions to a teacher. Your learning plan is entirely personalized.

Once you’ve chosen your topic, just hit the “Generate a Lesson” button, and within seconds, you’ll get a lesson designed exclusively for you.

Join the room to begin your lesson

The session feels like a one-on-one language class with a human tutor—but without the high price or time constraints.

In a 25-minute lesson, Kylian teaches exactly what you need to know about your chosen topic: the nuances that textbooks never explain, key cultural differences between French and your target language, grammar rules, and much more.

Ever felt frustrated trying to keep up with a native-speaking teacher, or embarrassed to ask for something to be repeated? With Kylian, that problem disappears. It switches intelligently between French and the target language depending on your level, helping you understand every concept at your own pace.

During the lesson, Kylian uses role-plays, real-life examples, and adapts to your learning style. Didn’t understand something? No problem—you can pause Kylian anytime to ask for clarification, without fear of being judged.

Ask all the questions you want, repeat sections if needed, and customize your learning experience in ways traditional teachers and generic apps simply can’t match.

With 24/7 access at a fraction of the cost of private lessons, Kylian removes all the barriers that have kept you from mastering the language you’ve always wanted to learn.

Take your free lesson with Kylian today.