Plural of Formula in English: Formulas or Formulae?

Words derived from Latin frequently challenge English speakers, and "formula" stands as a prime example of this linguistic phenomenon. When we need to reference multiple formulas, should we use "formulas" or "formulae"? This question extends beyond mere grammatical correctness—it reflects the evolving nature of English and how it incorporates terms from classical languages while adapting them to modern usage patterns.

Understanding the correct plural form of "formula" matters particularly in academic, scientific, and professional contexts where precision in language reflects clarity of thought. The plural form you choose can signal your familiarity with formal conventions and potentially influence how your writing is perceived by specific audiences.

Formula: Etymology and Background

The word "formula" entered English in the early 17th century, derived directly from Latin where it originally meant "form, draft, regulation, or method." Its Latin roots explain why it presents a plural formation challenge. While most English nouns simply add "-s" or "-es" to form plurals, words with Latin origins often maintain their classical plural forms, at least in certain contexts.

In its original Latin form, "formula" belongs to the first declension of Latin nouns, which traditionally form their plurals by changing the ending "-a" to "-ae." This is why "formulae" (pronounced "for-myuh-lee") exists as a plural option.

The etymology of "formula" helps explain why we face this duality in plural forms. This word exemplifies the tension between classical convention and natural language evolution—a linguistic tug-of-war that occurs repeatedly as English absorbs vocabulary from other languages.

Formulas vs. Formulae: Which is Correct?

Both "formulas" and "formulae" function as legitimate plural forms of "formula" in contemporary English. Your choice between these options depends primarily on context, audience, and regional preferences:

Formulas follows the standard English pattern of plural formation by adding "-s" to the singular noun. This anglicized version has become increasingly common in everyday usage, general writing, and many professional contexts. Most style guides now accept "formulas" as the standard plural form in American English.

Formulae adheres to the classical Latin plural formation. This version appears most commonly in academic, scientific, and particularly British English contexts. Fields like mathematics, chemistry, and formal scientific writing often prefer this form to signal precision and scholarly convention.

The correctness of either form ultimately depends on your audience's expectations and the level of formality required. Neither option is inherently wrong, though specific style guides or institutional preferences may dictate which form to use in particular settings.

Usage in Different Contexts

The plural form of "formula" varies notably across different contexts and professional domains:

Scientific and Academic Writing

In formal scientific literature, especially in fields with strong traditional ties to classical languages, "formulae" remains prevalent. Disciplines like theoretical physics, pure mathematics, and certain branches of chemistry often maintain this classical form in scholarly publications. However, even within scientific communities, usage has been gradually shifting toward the anglicized "formulas" in many peer-reviewed journals and textbooks.

Academic style guides often acknowledge both forms while providing specific recommendations based on discipline and publication type. For example, many scientific style manuals still recommend "formulae" for formal research papers while accepting "formulas" in educational materials aimed at broader audiences.

Business and General Usage

In business communications, marketing materials, and general writing, "formulas" has become the predominant form. Corporate documents, business reports, and mainstream publications typically prefer the anglicized version for its accessibility and alignment with standard English patterns. Product packaging, advertising copy, and business correspondence almost universally use "formulas."

This preference reflects a broader trend toward simplification and standardization of English plurals in professional contexts outside academia. The business world generally favors clarity and immediate comprehension over classical convention.

Regional Differences

Geographic factors significantly influence which plural form predominates:

American English strongly favors "formulas" across nearly all contexts except the most formal scientific writing. American style guides, including the influential Chicago Manual of Style and AP Stylebook, generally recommend the anglicized form.

British English demonstrates greater variation, with "formulae" appearing more frequently than in American contexts. British academic publications, quality newspapers, and formal writing maintain the classical form more consistently, though "formulas" has gained substantial ground in everyday British usage as well.

Other English-speaking regions typically follow either American or British conventions depending on their historical ties and educational systems, with Commonwealth countries often leaning toward British preferences while showing increasing acceptance of the simplified form.

Historical Trends in Usage

Language evolves continuously, and the usage patterns for "formula" plurals illustrate this dynamic process clearly. Examining historical trends reveals how preferences have shifted over time:

In the 18th and 19th centuries, "formulae" dominated in English writing across virtually all contexts. This reflected the strong classical education of the era's writers and the prestige associated with Latin and Greek learning. During this period, using the anglicized "formulas" might have marked one as less educated or precise.

The early to mid-20th century witnessed the beginning of a significant shift. As English became increasingly democratized and scientific writing aimed for greater clarity, "formulas" gained legitimacy. Data from corpus linguistics shows a steady increase in the frequency of "formulas" relative to "formulae" beginning around the 1920s.

Contemporary usage data from the past few decades reveals that "formulas" now appears approximately four times more frequently than "formulae" in published English texts overall, though this ratio varies significantly by field and region. This shift reflects broader sociolinguistic trends toward regularization and simplification of English plurals.

Specialized Applications

The plural choice takes on particular significance in specialized domains:

Mathematical Context

In mathematics, both forms appear, but usage often correlates with the specific subfield and level of abstraction. Pure mathematics and theoretical papers more frequently use "formulae," while applied mathematics and educational texts often prefer "formulas." Expressions like "mathematical formulas/formulae" appear in both forms, though major mathematics publishers increasingly standardize around "formulas" for consistency.

Famous examples like Einstein's field equations, Newton's laws of motion, or the quadratic formula are collectively referenced using either plural form depending on the publication's style guidelines.

Chemical Context

Chemistry presents an interesting case where context influences the plural choice. When discussing chemical compounds and their representations, "formulae" remains somewhat more common, especially in academic literature. Phrases like "chemical formulae" or "structural formulae" maintain stronger connections to the classical form.

In industrial and applied chemistry, however, "formulas" predominates, especially when discussing product formulations, cleaning formulas, or manufacturing specifications.

Linguistic Comparison with Similar Latin-derived Terms

"Formula" belongs to a category of Latin-derived words ending in "-a" that present similar plural challenges. Comparing its usage patterns with related terms reveals instructive patterns:

Antenna: "Antennas" (physical devices) vs. "Antennae" (biological structures)

Nebula: "Nebulas" (increasingly common) vs. "Nebulae" (still prevalent in astronomy)

Vertebra: "Vertebras" (rare) vs. "Vertebrae" (strongly preferred in anatomy)

Larva: "Larvas" (uncommon) vs. "Larvae" (standard in biology)

This comparison demonstrates that different Latin-derived terms have evolved along distinct trajectories. Some, like "vertebra," strongly maintain their classical plurals, while others have largely completed the transition to anglicized forms. "Formula" occupies a middle position in this evolutionary spectrum, with both forms actively used.

Digital and Modern Media Usage

Contemporary digital contexts reveal evolving patterns in formula pluralization:

Social media analysis indicates that informal digital communication heavily favors "formulas," with "formulae" appearing primarily in academic discussions or as a stylistic choice signaling erudition. Hashtag frequency on platforms like Twitter and Instagram shows #formulas outperforming #formulae by a ratio of approximately 8:1.

Computational and programming contexts almost exclusively use "formulas," particularly in spreadsheet applications, database terminology, and coding discussions. For example, Excel documentation refers to "formulas" throughout, reflecting the software industry's preference for anglicized pluralization.

Content analysis of digital educational resources reveals an interesting divide: K-12 materials predominantly use "formulas," while higher education resources show greater variation, with "formulae" appearing more frequently in advanced undergraduate and graduate-level content.

Style Guide Recommendations

Major style guides provide specific guidance on this plural form:

The Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition) notes both forms as acceptable but recommends "formulas" for general contexts and allows "formulae" in specialized scientific writing.

AP Stylebook explicitly recommends "formulas" in all contexts, aligning with its general preference for simplified, anglicized forms.

The MLA Handbook accepts both forms but suggests writers maintain consistency within a single document.

Scientific style guides show more variation: The ACS (American Chemical Society) Style Guide permits both forms but increasingly recommends "formulas" for consistency, while some mathematics and physics publishers still prefer "formulae" in certain contexts.

These varying recommendations reflect the transitional status of this plural form in contemporary English, with style authorities acknowledging both options while generally trending toward the anglicized version.

Pronunciation Guide

Proper pronunciation differs between the two plural forms:

Formulas: pronounced /ˈfɔːr.mjə.ləz/ (for-myuh-luhz), following standard English plural pronunciation patterns.

Formulae: traditionally pronounced /ˈfɔːr.mjə.liː/ (for-myuh-lee), maintaining the classical Latin diphthong sound for the "-ae" ending.

This pronunciation difference can sometimes influence written form choice, as speakers more familiar with classical language patterns may naturally gravitate toward "formulae" in their writing.

Common Mistakes and Misconceptions

Several misunderstandings frequently arise regarding "formula" plurals:

One common misconception is that "formulae" is inherently more correct or sophisticated than "formulas." Linguistic authority no longer supports this view—both forms are legitimate, with context determining appropriateness.

Another error involves inconsistent usage within a single document, switching between "formulas" and "formulae." Style guides universally recommend selecting one form and applying it consistently throughout a text.

Some writers incorrectly believe that the choice depends solely on the subject matter rather than audience and context. While subject domain influences typical usage patterns, neither form is technically incorrect in any field.

Finally, the mistaken belief that "formulae" should be italicized as a foreign term persists in some circles. Contemporary style guides clarify that both "formula" and "formulae" have been thoroughly incorporated into English and require no special typographical treatment.

Practical Guidelines for Writers

For those facing this plural choice in their writing, consider these practical recommendations:

Assess your audience: Technical, academic, or British audiences may expect or appreciate "formulae," while general readers typically find "formulas" more natural.

Consult relevant style guides: If writing for a publication or institution, check their specific guidelines on Latin plurals.

Maintain consistency: Whichever form you choose, use it consistently throughout your document.

Consider domain conventions: Research how similar publications in your specific field typically handle this plural.

Recognize the trend: Acknowledge that general usage is moving toward "formulas," even in many traditionally formal contexts.

These guidelines help navigate the choice pragmatically, recognizing that effective communication remains the primary goal of any writing.

Impact on Language Learning

For English language learners, the dual pluralization of "formula" presents particular challenges:

ESL/EFL curricula typically introduce "formulas" as the standard plural in general English courses, introducing "formulae" only at advanced levels or in specialized academic preparation.

Teaching materials increasingly acknowledge both forms while emphasizing context-appropriate usage rather than declaring one form universally correct.

Language assessment often accepts either plural form as correct, though some academic English examinations may evaluate whether candidates can deploy the appropriate form for specific contexts.

This pedagogical approach reflects the descriptive rather than prescriptive stance of modern linguistics, acknowledging language as it is actually used rather than imposing rigid classical standards.

Evolution of English Pluralization

The case of "formula" illustrates broader patterns in how English handles foreign-derived plurals:

Linguistic research documents a general historical trend toward regularization of plurals in English, with Latin and Greek forms gradually giving way to standard English patterns. This process, sometimes called "naturalization," typically progresses from specialized academic usage to general acceptance of anglicized forms.

Sociolinguistic factors influencing this evolution include democratization of education, globalization of English usage, emphasis on clarity in communication, and declining familiarity with classical languages.

"Formula" exemplifies this evolutionary process in mid-stream—far enough along that both forms coexist legitimately, but not so complete that the classical form has disappeared from common usage.

Computational Linguistics Perspective

Modern corpus analysis provides quantitative insights into this pluralization pattern:

Data mining of academic journals across decades reveals discipline-specific trends—physics and pure mathematics maintained "formulae" longer than computer science and engineering, which adopted "formulas" earlier and more comprehensively.

Digital text analysis confirms a clear transition point in the mid-20th century when "formulas" began outpacing "formulae" in general published works, with the crossover occurring approximately between 1950-1970 depending on the genre and region.

Natural language processing systems now typically recognize both forms as valid plurals, though some older automated grammar checkers may still flag one or the other incorrectly.

Beyond Pluralization: Other Grammatical Considerations

The plural form represents just one aspect of using "formula" correctly:

Adjectival forms derive from "formula" as "formulaic" (describing something that follows a set pattern or formula) or "formular" (less commonly used, relating to formulas).

Possessive forms follow standard English patterns: "the formula's application" (singular possessive) or "the formulas'/formulae's applications" (plural possessive).

Compound terms using "formula" generally follow the same pluralization patterns: "race-car formulas/formulae," "baby formulas" (almost never "baby formulae"), or "mathematical formulas/formulae."

These related grammatical considerations further illustrate how "formula" integrates into broader English language patterns.

Learn Any Language with Kylian AI

Private language lessons are expensive. Paying between 15 and 50 euros per lesson isn’t realistic for most people—especially when dozens of sessions are needed to see real progress.

Many learners give up on language learning due to these high costs, missing out on valuable professional and personal opportunities.

That’s why we created Kylian: to make language learning accessible to everyone and help people master a foreign language without breaking the bank.

To get started, just tell Kylian which language you want to learn and what your native language is

Tired of teachers who don’t understand your specific struggles as a French speaker? Kylian’s advantage lies in its ability to teach any language using your native tongue as the foundation.

Unlike generic apps that offer the same content to everyone, Kylian explains concepts in your native language (French) and switches to the target language when necessary—perfectly adapting to your level and needs.

This personalization removes the frustration and confusion that are so common in traditional language learning.

Choose a specific topic you want to learn

Frustrated by language lessons that never cover exactly what you need? Kylian can teach you any aspect of a language—from pronunciation to advanced grammar—by focusing on your specific goals.

Avoid vague requests like “How can I improve my accent?” and be precise: “How do I pronounce the R like a native English speaker?” or “How do I conjugate the verb ‘to be’ in the present tense?”

With Kylian, you’ll never again pay for irrelevant content or feel embarrassed asking “too basic” questions to a teacher. Your learning plan is entirely personalized.

Once you’ve chosen your topic, just hit the “Generate a Lesson” button, and within seconds, you’ll get a lesson designed exclusively for you.

Join the room to begin your lesson

The session feels like a one-on-one language class with a human tutor—but without the high price or time constraints.

In a 25-minute lesson, Kylian teaches exactly what you need to know about your chosen topic: the nuances that textbooks never explain, key cultural differences between French and your target language, grammar rules, and much more.

Ever felt frustrated trying to keep up with a native-speaking teacher, or embarrassed to ask for something to be repeated? With Kylian, that problem disappears. It switches intelligently between French and the target language depending on your level, helping you understand every concept at your own pace.

During the lesson, Kylian uses role-plays, real-life examples, and adapts to your learning style. Didn’t understand something? No problem—you can pause Kylian anytime to ask for clarification, without fear of being judged.

Ask all the questions you want, repeat sections if needed, and customize your learning experience in ways traditional teachers and generic apps simply can’t match.

With 24/7 access at a fraction of the cost of private lessons, Kylian removes all the barriers that have kept you from mastering the language you’ve always wanted to learn.