Study: Americans' Favorite New Words English

Language evolution happens whether we acknowledge it or not. Dictionary.com added over 200 words in the past year, reflecting how rapidly English adapts to cultural shifts, technological advances, and generational changes. A comprehensive survey of 1,012 Americans reveals which new dictionary additions resonate most—and which ones people actively reject.

The data exposes fascinating generational divides, political tensions, and practical preferences that shape how Americans embrace linguistic change. Understanding these patterns matters for educators, content creators, and anyone navigating modern English communication.

The Democratic Process of Language Adoption

Language adoption isn't random—it follows predictable patterns based on utility, cultural relevance, and demographic alignment. When Dictionary.com formalizes new words, they're acknowledging terms that have already gained significant traction in everyday usage.

The survey methodology captured responses from a demographically diverse group: 48% women, 49% men, and 2% nonbinary participants, with an average age of 39. Political affiliation broke down as 49% Democrats, 15% Republicans, 30% Independents, and 6% other affiliations. This distribution provides meaningful insight into how different segments of American society process linguistic innovation.

The research examined 33 recently added dictionary words alongside 23 social justice terms, asking participants to rate their preferences, perceived utility, and overall reactions. The results reveal that word adoption follows distinct patterns based on practical value, generational identity, and political worldview.

Americans' Most Beloved New Dictionary Additions

The survey identified five clear winners that earned widespread approval across demographic lines. These terms succeeded because they fill genuine communication gaps in modern discourse.

Gameplay emerged as the top favorite, particularly among men (90% approval) compared to women. This term's success reflects gaming's mainstream cultural acceptance and the need for precise language around interactive entertainment experiences. The word serves a functional purpose that existing vocabulary couldn't adequately address.

Side hustle ranked second, demonstrating universal appeal across age groups and political affiliations. The gig economy's expansion created demand for terminology that captures supplementary income generation—a concept that traditional employment language couldn't describe effectively.

Content warning claimed third place, highlighting society's increased sensitivity to potentially triggering material. This term's popularity spans political divides because it serves practical communication needs in digital environments where diverse audiences encounter varied content.

Y'all secured fourth position, representing the formalization of regional dialect into standard dictionary recognition. This inclusion validates Southern American English patterns and provides inclusive alternatives to awkward plural pronoun constructions.

Silver fox rounded out the top five, with particular appeal among women (80% approval). This term fills a vocabulary gap for describing attractive older men, reflecting changing attitudes toward aging and desirability.

The success of these terms demonstrates that Americans embrace new words when they serve clear communicative functions or reflect genuine cultural shifts. Each addresses specific modern phenomena that existing vocabulary couldn't capture adequately.

Generational Fault Lines in Word Acceptance

Age-based preferences reveal striking patterns in how different generations process linguistic innovation. The data exposes surprising reversals in expected technological adoption patterns.

Older Americans (Baby Boomers and Gen X) showed unexpected enthusiasm for digital-age terminology. Seventy percent embraced "metaverse" compared to 61% of younger Americans. Similarly, 52% of older respondents approved "NFT" versus 44% of younger participants. This pattern suggests older generations view these terms as necessary vocabulary for understanding contemporary digital landscapes.

The "manosphere" term gained 42% approval among older Americans compared to 35% among younger respondents. This counterintuitive preference indicates older generations may view such terminology as useful for categorizing online phenomena they observe but don't necessarily participate in.

Younger Americans gravitated toward terms describing nuanced social interactions. Sixty-five percent appreciated "deplatform" compared to 50% of older respondents. The term "translanguaging" earned 39% approval among younger Americans versus 29% among older participants. These preferences reflect younger generations' direct experience with social media dynamics and multilingual communication environments.

The most dramatic generational divide appeared in relationship and attraction terminology. Younger Americans embraced "snack" (71% approval), "throuple" (55%), and "zaddy" (40%)—terms older generations largely rejected. This pattern reflects different comfort levels with evolving relationship structures and explicit attraction language.

Functional Utility Versus Popularity

Americans distinguish clearly between words they like and words they consider practically useful. This separation reveals sophisticated linguistic judgment about communication effectiveness versus personal preference.

The five most useful additions according to respondents were side hustle, content warning, gameplay, trigger, and megadrought. These terms earned utility recognition because they describe specific phenomena requiring precise language.

"Side hustle" topped utility rankings because it captures economic realities that traditional employment vocabulary couldn't address. The gig economy's expansion necessitated terminology for supplementary income generation beyond conventional job categories.

"Content warning" achieved high utility ratings (90% of Americans) because it serves essential communication functions in digital environments. The term provides necessary context for content consumption decisions across diverse audiences with varying sensitivities.

"Gameplay" earned utility recognition (nearly 90% approval) because it distinguishes interactive entertainment experiences from passive consumption. This specificity matters as gaming becomes increasingly central to entertainment and social interaction.

"Trigger" gained utility acceptance (80% approval) because it provides clinical precision for discussing trauma responses. The term's psychological origins lend credibility to discussions about mental health and emotional safety.

"Megadrought" achieved utility recognition (80% approval) because climate change creates new weather pattern categories requiring specific terminology. The 20-plus year duration criterion provides measurable distinction from regular drought classifications.

The Language Rejects: Terms Americans Dislike

The survey revealed five terms that Americans actively dislike: misper, cheeseparing, zaddy, translanguaging, and heteropatriarchy. These rejections follow predictable patterns based on obscurity, political sensitivity, and cultural disconnect.

"Misper" (missing person abbreviated) topped the rejection list because it creates unnecessary jargon for established concepts. Americans resist linguistic shortcuts that don't improve communication efficiency or clarity. The term feels like insider police terminology inappropriately pushed into general usage.

"Cheeseparing" earned widespread rejection (75% of Americans) because it introduces archaic-sounding terminology for concepts already well-covered by existing vocabulary. Words like "stingy" or "frugal" serve the same function without requiring new dictionary additions.

"Zaddy" faced rejection despite younger generation approval because it represents highly specific slang that doesn't translate across demographic boundaries. The term's narrow applicability limits its perceived utility for general communication purposes.

"Translanguaging" struggled with acceptance because it describes academic linguistic concepts using complex terminology. While the phenomenon exists, the word itself feels unnecessarily technical for describing natural multilingual communication patterns.

"Heteropatriarchy" provoked the strongest negative reactions, particularly among men (72% disapproval) compared to women (56%). This term's political implications overshadow its descriptive utility, creating resistance based on ideological rather than linguistic concerns.

Political Polarization in Language Evolution

Social justice terminology reveals deep political divisions in language acceptance. The survey exposed how political identity influences linguistic adoption patterns, with Republicans showing significantly higher rejection rates for gender and race-related terms.

"Cisgender" created the largest political divide, with Republicans showing overwhelming rejection compared to Democratic acceptance. This pattern repeats across gender identity terminology, suggesting political worldview heavily influences willingness to adopt new identity language.

"Critical race theory" prompted strong Republican rejection while receiving more acceptance among Democrats. The term's political weaponization in recent years affects its reception regardless of academic origins or definitional accuracy.

"White privilege" generated similar partisan responses, with Republicans rejecting the terminology while Democrats showed greater acceptance. These patterns demonstrate how political identity shapes receptiveness to language describing systemic social phenomena.

Interestingly, "minor-attracted persons" provoked negative reactions across political lines, with 45% of Democrats expressing annoyance despite generally higher tolerance for new terminology. This suggests some linguistic boundaries transcend political affiliation when terms challenge fundamental social taboos.

The data reveals that Americans evaluate politically charged terminology differently than functional vocabulary additions. Political identity becomes a primary filter for acceptance when new words touch on contested social concepts.

Digital Age Vocabulary Gains Mainstream Acceptance

Technology-related terms achieved surprising mainstream acceptance across age groups, suggesting Americans recognize the necessity of digital vocabulary regardless of personal technology adoption levels.

"Metaverse" earned approval from 70% of respondents, indicating broad recognition of virtual environment concepts even among non-participants. This acceptance reflects media coverage and corporate investment making the term culturally relevant beyond direct user experience.

"Deplatform" gained utility recognition from two-thirds of Americans because social media content moderation affects public discourse broadly. The term provides necessary vocabulary for discussing online censorship and content management policies.

"Memeify" achieved moderate acceptance because internet culture influences mainstream communication patterns. Even Americans who don't actively create memes understand the concept's relevance to modern humor and viral content distribution.

"Code-switching" earned recognition because it describes communication behaviors many Americans practice unconsciously. The term provides vocabulary for discussing how people adapt language patterns across different social contexts.

The acceptance of digital terminology demonstrates American pragmatism about linguistic evolution. When new words serve clear communicative functions in increasingly digital environments, adoption follows practical necessity rather than technological enthusiasm.

Climate and Social Vocabulary Reflects Contemporary Concerns

Environmental and social terminology gained acceptance based on immediate relevance to current American experiences and concerns.

"Megadrought" achieved high utility recognition because extreme weather events require precise language for public policy and personal planning discussions. Climate change creates new environmental categories that existing vocabulary cannot adequately describe.

"Trigger" gained acceptance because mental health awareness increased across demographic groups. The term provides clinical precision for discussing psychological responses in mainstream conversation, reflecting reduced stigma around mental health topics.

"Micromobility" earned recognition because urban transportation options expanded beyond traditional categories. Electric scooters, bike-sharing, and similar innovations require vocabulary that distinguishes them from conventional transit options.

"Forest bathing" achieved acceptance because wellness practices from other cultures gained American adoption. The term provides specific language for nature-based therapeutic activities that general outdoor recreation terminology couldn't capture precisely.

These terms succeeded because they address contemporary phenomena requiring new vocabulary. Americans embrace linguistic innovation when it serves practical communication needs about current experiences and concerns.

Implications for English Language Evolution

The survey data reveals several key patterns shaping English language evolution in contemporary America. Understanding these trends matters for educators, content creators, and communication professionals navigating changing linguistic landscapes.

Utility drives adoption more than popularity. Americans distinguish between words they personally like and words they recognize as functionally necessary. This suggests successful new vocabulary must serve clear communicative purposes rather than simply reflecting cultural trends.

Generational differences follow complex patterns that don't align with typical technology adoption assumptions. Older Americans embrace some digital terminology while rejecting slang, suggesting practical vocabulary assessment transcends age-based stereotypes.

Political identity significantly influences receptiveness to social terminology but has minimal impact on functional vocabulary acceptance. This division suggests Americans separate linguistic utility from ideological agreement when evaluating new words.

The data indicates English continues evolving to meet communication needs created by technological, social, and environmental changes. Americans demonstrate sophisticated judgment about which innovations deserve permanent linguistic incorporation versus temporary cultural attention.

For English language learners and educators, these patterns suggest focusing on utility-driven vocabulary that serves clear communicative functions across demographic boundaries. Political and generational preferences matter less than practical communication value in determining long-term linguistic adoption.

Learn Any Language with Kylian AI

Private language lessons are expensive. Paying between 15 and 50 euros per lesson isn’t realistic for most people—especially when dozens of sessions are needed to see real progress.

Many learners give up on language learning due to these high costs, missing out on valuable professional and personal opportunities.

That’s why we created Kylian: to make language learning accessible to everyone and help people master a foreign language without breaking the bank.

To get started, just tell Kylian which language you want to learn and what your native language is

Tired of teachers who don’t understand your specific struggles as a French speaker? Kylian’s advantage lies in its ability to teach any language using your native tongue as the foundation.

Unlike generic apps that offer the same content to everyone, Kylian explains concepts in your native language (French) and switches to the target language when necessary—perfectly adapting to your level and needs.

This personalization removes the frustration and confusion that are so common in traditional language learning.

Choose a specific topic you want to learn

Frustrated by language lessons that never cover exactly what you need? Kylian can teach you any aspect of a language—from pronunciation to advanced grammar—by focusing on your specific goals.

Avoid vague requests like “How can I improve my accent?” and be precise: “How do I pronounce the R like a native English speaker?” or “How do I conjugate the verb ‘to be’ in the present tense?”

With Kylian, you’ll never again pay for irrelevant content or feel embarrassed asking “too basic” questions to a teacher. Your learning plan is entirely personalized.

Once you’ve chosen your topic, just hit the “Generate a Lesson” button, and within seconds, you’ll get a lesson designed exclusively for you.

Join the room to begin your lesson

The session feels like a one-on-one language class with a human tutor—but without the high price or time constraints.

In a 25-minute lesson, Kylian teaches exactly what you need to know about your chosen topic: the nuances that textbooks never explain, key cultural differences between French and your target language, grammar rules, and much more.

Ever felt frustrated trying to keep up with a native-speaking teacher, or embarrassed to ask for something to be repeated? With Kylian, that problem disappears. It switches intelligently between French and the target language depending on your level, helping you understand every concept at your own pace.

During the lesson, Kylian uses role-plays, real-life examples, and adapts to your learning style. Didn’t understand something? No problem—you can pause Kylian anytime to ask for clarification, without fear of being judged.

Ask all the questions you want, repeat sections if needed, and customize your learning experience in ways traditional teachers and generic apps simply can’t match.

With 24/7 access at a fraction of the cost of private lessons, Kylian removes all the barriers that have kept you from mastering the language you’ve always wanted to learn.

Take your free lesson with Kylian today.